- Programs and Services
Dear MNO citizens,?
Ontario¡¯s Denial of M¨¦tis Rights and the Powley Case
For many of you who have been with the MNO since its beginning, you will remember the days when the Ontario Government¡¯s official legal position was that it did ¡°not recognize any M¨¦tis right to hunt for food, or any ¡®special access rights to natural resources¡¯ for the M¨¦tis whatsoever.¡±
During this same period, Ontario put in place an Interim Enforcement Policy (¡°IEP¡±) that provided that moose tag requirements and seasonal restrictions were not enforced against ¡°Status Indians¡±; however, the IEP was not applied to M¨¦tis. Therefore, M¨¦tis harvesters were prosecuted like criminals even though they were exercising their constitutional rights.
As a part of its M¨¦tis rights-based agenda, MNO decided to challenge Ontario¡¯s flawed legal position¡ªall the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Powley case was taken as a ¡°test case¡± for Ontario M¨¦tis as well as the rest of the M¨¦tis Nation. The MNO called this the ¡°M¨¦tis Hunt for Justice.¡±
Between 1995 to 2003, three levels of Ontario courts, and, finally, the Supreme Court of Canada, all found that Steve and Roddy Powley were exercising a collectively-held M¨¦tis right to hunt for food, protected by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. Specifically, the Supreme Court found that there was and remains a rights-bearing M¨¦tis community in the Sault Ste. Marie region.
The MNO Harvesters¡¯ Policy
Since the late 1990s, the MNO has implemented its own Harvester¡¯s Policy to regulate the M¨¦tis harvest in Ontario.? As a part of this policy, the MNO has identified 12 M¨¦tis Traditional Harvesting Territories (¡°MNO Harvesting Areas¡±) where it asserts M¨¦tis harvesting rights exist.
The MNO did this because it takes the position that if the M¨¦tis in the Sault Ste. Marie region could establish M¨¦tis harvesting rights protected by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, so too could M¨¦tis communities in these other MNO Harvesting Areas.
Based on this approach, the MNO issues Harvester Cards to MNO citizens that ancestrally connect to the historic rights-bearing M¨¦tis communities that relied on these MNO Harvesting Areas for food as well as cultural and ceremonial purposes.
A Negotiated Agreement with Ontario
Following the Powley decision, the MNO pursued negotiations with Ontario to develop a harvesting agreement that accommodates M¨¦tis rights to harvest in the 12 MNO Harvesting Areas. Less than a year after the Supreme Court released the Powley decision, a four-point Harvesting Agreement was in place (in spring of 2014). The four points of agreement are:
Amendments to the Negotiated Agreement
In September of 2015, Ontario and MNO met and agreed to amend the Harvesting Agreement to allow the MNO to issue an additional 200 Harvester¡¯s Cards. This was subject to some additional terms and conditions which included, for example, data sharing on regarding the M¨¦tis harvest to assist in effective natural resource management and planning.
Under the amended Agreement, Ontario is obligated to share information with the MNO about moose harvesting pressures. The MNO agreed to provide this information to Harvester¡¯s Card holders to enable harvesters to make informed decisions about where/what species to hunt. This communiqu¨¦ is in fulfillment of this obligation to share information with M¨¦tis harvesters about the state of the moose population in Ontario.?
This sharing of information in no way prevents those with Harvester¡¯s Cards from harvesting moose in their traditional territory. It is intended to provide harvesters with the information to make a voluntary decision to modify hunting practices in the interests of conservation.
The State of the Moose Population in Ontario
Overall, Ontario¡¯s moose population has been in steady decline since about 2004. A variety of factors impact moose population: climate, hunting, predators, parasites and disease, competitors, biological characteristics, habitat, and accidents. The interactions of all of these various factors is complex and not completely understood.
However, the MNR does know that one main contributor to this population decline is lower rates of moose calf recruitment. This decline can be influenced by a number of the factors listed above.? In order for the moose population to remain steady, an area must meet a threshold of 30 calves to 100 cows surviving to their first winter. There are several Wildlife Management Units (¡°WMUs¡±) spread across the province that are not meeting that threshold and as a result, the moose population is in decline.
Calf tag allocation was implemented in Ontario in four WMUs in 2004 to slow moose declines in those areas. In 2015, the hunting season for calves was shortened in Northern Ontario, and beginning this year, the moose season was delayed by one week in much of Northern Ontario (for non-Indigenous hunters).
Ontario has drafted moose population density objectives for all parts of Ontario, dividing the province into six large zones. Only two of those six zones are within the optimal population density. The other four are currently below the desired moose density, for a variety of reasons, one of which is calf recruitment.
The maps produced below are intended to guide Harvester Card holders¡¯ attention to areas where calf and adult populations are the most robust.? It is intended to inform harvesters of the areas where they can choose to harvest in order to promote conservation and a healthy moose population. In the areas where moose populations are not as robust, harvesters may wish to consider hunting other species such as bear or deer.
Further Resources on Moose Populations in Ontario
If you are interested in more detailed information on moose populations in Ontario, you can visit https://www.ontario.ca/page/moose-population-management. This website contains detailed maps and statistics for moose populations in the six Cervid Ecological Zones as well as the individual WMUs.
Other resources on moose populations include:
M. Margaret Froh
Chief Captain of the Hunt
M¨¦tis Nation of Ontario
เกมยิงปลาสุดยอดเกมทำเงินอันดับ 1 R v Powley, 2003 SCC 43 at para. 47. This decision can be accessed online at: http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2076/index.do Pape Salter Teillet LLP has prepared a summary of this decision that is also available online at: http://www.pstlaw.ca/resources/Powley%20summary-final.pdf
 The MNO¡¯s Harvester¡¯s Policy is available online at: /media/51947/harvesting%20policy%20(22-aug-2011).pdf. A map of M¨¦tis Harvesting Areas in Ontario is available online at: /media/205512/interim_harvesting_map_de2011.pdf
Published on: November 29, 2016